Inter as l2vpn option broker

How do I move those? Remember to delete the old connections so we stop billing you for them. If min links is set to 3, you can then delete a port from the bundle. Can I convert a bundle back to individual ports? See the API section. Does the LAG show as a single connection or a collection of connections? What does Min Links mean, and why do I have a check box for it when I order my bundle?

Min links is a feature in LACP where you can set the minimum number of links needed to be active in a bundle for that bundle to be active and pass traffic.

If, for example, you have 4 ports, your min links is set to 3, and you only have 2 active ports, your bundle will not be active. If you have 3 or more then the bundle is active and will pass traffic if you have a VIF configured. Multiprotocol BGP is not supported at this time.

For IPv4, prefix limits will remain the same. Can I create a hosted virtual interface for someone that is IPv6 enabled? It will only work for like for like traffic.

Translation between IPv4 and IPv6 is not supported. You can advertise the default route via BGP. VPN Connections can be configured in minutes and are a good solution if you have an immediate need, have low to modest bandwidth requirements, and can tolerate the inherent variability in Internet-based connectivity. However, only in fail-over scenarios.

The Direct Connect path will always be preferred, when established, regardless of AS path prepending. It provides two main functions. Second; you can share private virtual interface to interface with more than one Virtual Private Clouds VPCs , enabling you to reduce the number of Border Gateway Protocol sessions between your on premise network and AWS deployments.

Are there additional fees when using Direct Connect Gateway and working with remote regions? You can continue to use the current practice of attaching your VIF to VGW; you will continue to have intra-region VPC connectivity, and will be charged egress rate that is applicable based on geographical regions.

Existing CloudHub functionality will continue to be supported. What type of traffic is supported, and not supported by Direct Connect Gateway? Can I do this with Direct Connect Gateway? I have existing private virtual interface associated with VGW, can I associate my existing private virtual interface with Direct Connect Gateway? Please create a new private virtual interface, and at the time of creation, associate with your Direct Connect Gateway.

Can I use any ASN - public and private? You can assign any private ASN to the Amazon side. You cannot assign any other public ASN. We want to protect customers from BGP spoofing. You can choose any private ASN.

Ranges for bit private ASNs include to You can also provide bit ASNs between and How can I make this change? Your device configuration also needs to change appropriately.

Please note, the Amazon side ASN you will recieve depends on your private virtual interface association. I use CloudHub today. Will I have to adjust my configuration in the future? I want to select a bit ASN. What is the range of bit private ASNs? No, you cannot modify the Amazon side ASN after creation. You will receive all Amazon IP prefixes for the region that you are connecting to in supported AWS Regions, and on-net prefixes from other AWS non-regional point of presence PoP as available such as CloudFront you can refer to this link for more information.

This includes prefixes necessary to reach AWS services, and may include prefixes for other Amazon affiliates, including those of www. Therefore, prefixes of services such as Route53 or certain CloudFront locations that are not on the Amazon backbone network will not be advertised through Direct Connect. Please see the AWS Direct Connect community forum for the additional details in the routing policy of the public virtual interface.

I am going to create a new public virtual interface; do I need to do anything special to get global Amazon public IP prefixes? Will this new capability affect my existing public virtual interfaces? How many prefixes will you advertise over my newly created public virtual interface? Yes, you can opt out using scoping communities. I want to migrate my existing public virtual interface to recieve global prefixes; how can I do this migration?

You have two options to do such a migration. First, create a new public virtual interface, migrate traffic from your existing public virtual interface to the newly created public virtual interface; delete your old public virtual interface. Second, open a support case to request scope change for your existing public virtual interface, you will experience a Border Gateway Protocol flap during the scope change. What is this feature? This feature provides support for local preference communities for private virtual interfaces.

With communities, customers can influence the return path for traffic sourced from VPC address space. Yes, all existing BGP sessions on private virtual interfaces support the use of local preference communities.

Do you charge additionally for this feature? Will this feature be available on both Public and Private Virtual Interfaces? No, this feature is currently available for private virtual interfaces only.

Yes, this feature will work with private virtual interfaces attached with Direct Connect Gateway. What are the supported local preference communities for Direct Connect private virtual interface? The following communities are supported for private virtual interface and are evaluated in order of lowest to highest preference. Communities are mutually exclusive. What is the default behavior in case I do not use the supported communities? If you do not specify Local Preference communities for your private VIF, the default local preference is based on the distance to the Direct Connect Locations from the local region.

I have two private VIFs on a physical connections at a Direct Connect location; can I use supported communities to influence egress behavior across these two private VIFs? But in the explicit-path we see that the we have an exclude-address statement which is the ip of R2 physically connected interface to R1.

Please note that FRR helps the restoration of the traffic in just 50 ms. Lets now have a look at some of the outputs. If you still have any queries, please reply me on this blog post. I shall be happy to clarify those doubts.

If you want some other example, please let me know as well. Hi Genie, this is interesting stuff and the language used here is very simple.

The labs mentioned with the setup details are very helpful in doing the hands on and the concept clear. Keep posting useful stuff like this..

Can I post a question. I see that "tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute" is enabled on the Primary Tunnel Do we need this command for those Tunnel which we want to protect? Or this should be enabled on all the Tunnel interfaces on head end router? Have been banging my head on FRR link protection for few days. But finally got to understand the concept through your blog. If we want to have FRR at mid-points. So I just need to have this command on mid-point router "mpls traffic-eng backup-path Tunnel" and rest of things will be taken care by TE?

Hello Nik Thanks for posting questions. Please don't say sorry for posting question. Please feel free them to post as many as you have. Now coming to your first question.

By enabling this command we tell the primary tunnel that there is already a backup tunnel in case there is any failure on the Tunnel LSP. There may be different causes to it. This post is basically about Link protection. That means, within the path of the TE tunnel, there will be a link which we are trying to protect as the Tunnel is supposed to carry critical data traffic.

Flexible mechanism for supporting virtual private network services based on source-independent distributed advertisements. Method and apparatus for advertising border connection information of autonomous system. Automatic establishment of redundant paths with cautious restoration in a packet network. Methods, systems, and computer program products for load balanced and symmetric path computations for VoIP traffic engineering.

Systems and methods to determine network routes based on transmission medium length. Techniques for efficiently updating routing information upon shortest path tree computation. Method for transmitting label switching control information using the open shortest path first opaque link state advertisement option protocol.

Border gateway reservation protocol for tree-based aggregation of inter-domain reservations.